Alerts & Newsletters

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gaspar NoĆ© Says All Directors Are ‘Sucking D*cks For Financing’ And Women Enjoyed ‘Love’ More Than Men

In a conversation at the Locarno Film Festival, the director struck a provocative chord.
Gaspar Noe - Cinefamily
Gaspar NoƩ
Jeremy Deputat/Red Bull Content Pool

From his 2002 rape-revenge drama “Irreversible” to last year’s sexually-explicit 3D drama “Love,” director Gaspar Noé has never resisted the chance to provoke a strong reaction from his audience. That was certainly the case on Saturday at the Locarno Film Festival, when the Argentine filmmaker engaged in a lengthy public discussion about his work. The conversation, presented by The Red Bull Music Academy, was supposed to focus on psychedelia and drugs in cinema. While that topic was addressed — “the best LSD trip in the history of cinema is ‘2001: A Space Odyssey,'” he said early on — Noé eventually turned to a more heated diatribe on the challenges involved in making movies today.

“No director is independent,” he said. “They’re all sucking dicks to get some financing, [whether it’s] from Warner Bros. or some French TV company.” The director included himself in that assertion. “The truth is, when you make movies, you have to learn how to lie,” he added. “You have to convince people to give you money and you pretend they’ll get double, triple or 10 times as much.”

As an example, he cited his experience getting financing for “Irreversible,” which he pitched as a story told in reverse order to capitalize on the popularity of Christopher Nolan’s “Memento” at the time. Additionally, while the film’s notorious rape scene does contain graphic imagery, he recalled telling financiers they had nothing to worry about. “They asked me, ‘So there’s explicit sex in the movie?'” he explained. “I said, ‘Of course not’…That’s how the movie was made.”

Noé attributed his ability to make his next two films to the surprising commercial success of “Irreversible,” which grossed $792,000 in limited release. “Probably people regret that they made it,” he said. “But I’m very happy they did…I’m very proud of every single movie, whether they make money or not.” (“Irreversible” was produced in part by StudioCanal.)

He then shifted gears to discuss his experience transitioning out of short films to features, where he first experienced the business side of the film world. “When you make shorts, people don’t get paid. It’s mostly about being diplomatic that you’re going to do a masterpiece of short cinema,” he said. “You have to make sure the team is your friends because you’re learning the language, learning how to live, learning how to work.” Noé made his first feature, “I Stand Alone,” in 1998, and it was around that time that his perspective evolved. “When you get into the real world, where people have salaries, it’s another dimension in which the best people can be so annoying when they work over one hour,” he said. “I learned how greedy people were working on features.”

Setting aside the industry, Noé addressed the curious reception to his various films. While he has shrugged off criticism of the rape scene in “Irreversible” for years, he acknowledged its potential to yield problematic results. Noé said that when the film was released in Buenos Aires, his mother’s friend went to see it, and “the moment the rape scene started, the guy sitting next to her started masturbating. She missed the end of the movie. You don’t know how people will perceive the movie at the end of the tunnel. Psychos are everywhere.”

He came across a very different outcome for “Love,” which divided audiences even as it generated a lot of attention. (“I really like that movie,” he said. “I know some people don’t.”) In the months following its release, Noé heard from a lot of women who were fans. “I didn’t expect that so many women would like it,” he said, but developed a theory about the cause of that outcome. “I think it’s because the male character is a loser; the female character is far more intelligent,” he said. “I thought it was a sexy movie that would be more pleasing to a male audience, but it was the exact opposite.”

Daily Headlines
Daily Headlines covering Film, TV and more.

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Must Read
PMC Logo
IndieWire is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2024 IndieWire Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.